African-Americans
Deserve More from Social Security
by Malcolm Moore
I recently learned about an
African-American male who died of lupus at the age of 40. He
is survived by a wife and four children - with the youngest only
two years old.
Although the cause of his death is somewhat rare, the story in
its essence is quite common. African-American men often die young.
According to a 2003 report from the Centers for Disease Control,
the average African-American male can now expect to live 68.6
years. This is generally attributed to the poor quality of health
in African-American communities along with poor lifestyle decisions.
It is also common knowledge that married persons generally survive
longer, so the African-American community's relatively low marriage
rate doesn't help.
This is all relevant to the Social Security debate.
As argued by Representative Bill Thomas (R-CA), it makes good
sense to consider race and sex when assessing what Social Security
has to offer. Financial planners are first to advise developing
an investment portfolio tailor-made to individual needs. When
given the opportunity, workers individualize retirement portfolios.
Why should Social Security be any different?
Think about it. One presently cannot fully access what has been
paid into Social Security until age 65. That means that, on average,
African-American males enjoy only 3.6 years of payback for decades
of paying into the system.
What happens to the rest of the money? Well, the Social Security
"trust fund" is little more than an IOU. What has been
paid in has probably already benefited someone else. It is gone,
and none of it will go to the deceased's family - at least not
directly.
Critics downplay this disparity, saying African-Americans, on
average, still get more from the system than they pay into it
because survivor and disability benefits provide for those left
behind. Maybe so, but where is the dignity in depending on welfare
rather than the nest egg that supposedly grew with each paycheck?
This is why young and old African-Americans alike should favor
a privatization of Social Security and the establishment of personal
saving accounts. Furthermore, African-Americans should want reforms
that go far beyond the current debate.
First, African-Americans should want Social Security reform that
includes provisions that limit the cost of investing. Social
Security reform should not be a license for investment companies
to steal from the cookie jar owned by working-class African-Americans.
As the cost of computer technology continues to cheapen, personal
investment should be organized so that investors can monitor
and alter their portfolios at will and at a very low cost.
Second, African-Americans should want a provision that allows
the use of these personal savings to become homeowners. If increasing
African Americans homeownership is a national goal, it seems
only reasonable to permit investors to use their savings to purchase
a home.
This provision - which allows people to essentially borrow from
themselves rather than be beholden to a lender - is available
in most retirement savings plans today. Homeownership has historically
provided a very good rate of return. Owned property is an excellent
source of income in the form of reverse mortgages or simply their
resale value. Such a provision is not yet part of the current
debate.
Claims and counterclaims about the actuarial fairness of Social
Security for selected demographic groups - particularly African-American
males - continue to be disconcerting. Numerous articles on this
topic exist, but most are based on microsimulations and not actual
Social Security data.
Not until this issue is put to rest can a true debate begin on
reforming the Social Security to best benefit African-Americans.
To end the controversy, African-Americans should be calling on
the Social Security Administration to produce comprehensive and
corroborated studies that provide a definitive answer to the
question, "How do different demographic groups fair under
the current Social Security system?"
If it cannot provide such studies, it should tell us why not.
###
Malcolm Moore is a writer for
the black leadership network Project 21. Comments may be sent
to Project21@na[email protected].
Published by The National Center for Public Policy Research.
Reprints permitted provided source is credited. New Visions Commentaries
reflect the views of their author, and not necessarily those
of Project 21.
Donate
| Subscribe
| Search | About
Project 21 | What's
New | Blog | Project
21 | NCPPR