Talking Points on the Environment #4
Warning: Environmentalists May Be Hazardous to the Planet's Health
Mother Earth may have adversaries from an unexpected quarter -- the
environmental movement. Consider:
- Acid Rain - Swamps, bogs, marshes and other "wetlands" naturally
produce sulfur and nitrogen compounds -- or the "acid" found in "acid
rain." Between 35% and 85% of the earth's sulfur compounds and between
40% and 60% of its nitrogen are produced naturally. Nonetheless, radical
environmentalists not only oppose the loss of any wetlands whatsoever, but want
to expand them.
- Global Warming - Radical environmentalists dismiss reforestation as
insignificant, insisting that "tree farms are not real forests." To
them, only old growth forests are "real." But reforestation is
significant: Young trees remove 5 to 7 tons more of the "greenhouse gas"
CO2 per acre per annum than do old growth trees. While the preservation of
some old growth forests is certainly a worthy goal, without the old growth
timber harvests of the past and subsequent reforestation, atmospheric CO2
levels would undoubtedly be much higher.
- Air Pollution - Self-styled "environmentalists" advocate taxes on
energy as a means of improving environmental quality. Such taxes can
sometimes do just the opposite. For example, a BTU tax that places duties not
only on the energy content of various fuels, but on the energy used to extract,
refine and transport the fuels to market, could actually increase air
pollution. Such a tax would encourage industry to switch from using clean
western coal to using high-sulfur eastern coal because the cost of western coal
relative to eastern coal would rise as a result of the tax. Western coal
producers, who must transport their product vast distances to bring it to
market, would bear the brunt of the tax.
- Energy Conservation - Environmental radicals want to sharply restrict
logging in the U.S., some advocating reductions of up to 50%. For every
billion board feet of lumber replaced by wood substitutes, however, energy
consumption would rise by 720 million gallons of oil and CO2 emissions would
increase by 7.5 million tons. The U.S. currently consumes roughly 77 billion
board feet of wood fiber each year. If wood consumption were reduced by 50%,
27.7 billion additional gallons of oil would be needed for wood substitutes and
CO2 emissions would rise by 288.8 million tons.
Information from Trashing the Planet by Dixy Lee Ray (Regnery Gateway, 1990);
Center for International Trade in Forest Product Working Paper No. 361; and "The
Flaws in Clinton's Energy Tax," Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 934
by John Shanahan
Issue Date: June 4, 1993
Talking Points on the Economy: Environment #4, published by The National
Center for Public Policy Research, 501 Capitol Ct NE, Washington, D.C.
20002 Tel. (202) 543-4110, Fax (202)543-5975, info@nationalcenter.org,
http://www.nationalcenter/inter.net. For more information about Talking Points
on the Economy: Environment #4 contact Bob Adams at 202/543-4110 or
EPTF@AOL.com.
<<< Return to the Science and Environment
Page
<<< Return to the Talking Points on the
Environment Cards Page
<<< Return to the NCPPR Home Page