01 Jun 1997 Liability Reform for Volunteer Service Act (S. 514): What it Does
The Liability Reform for Volunteer Service Act
(S. 514): What it Does
Introduced by Senator John Ashcroft
Prior to the last decade, the number of lawsuits filed against volunteers barely was noticeable. However, in the mid- 1980’s, that changed and the possibility of personal liability was on the minds of a growing number of volunteers.
Volunteers, who selflessly give their time and energy to nonprofit organizations which vary from the Boy Scouts and Little League to the American Red Cross and Salvation Army, often find themselves in court facing lawsuits for their volunteer activities. The mere threat of lawsuits increasingly deters volunteers from donating their time and directly restricts the ability to provide important services. As far back as 1988, a study titled “The Liability Crisis and Use of Volunteers by Nonprofit Associations” found that approximately one in ten nonprofit organizations had experienced the resignation of a volunteer due to liability concerns and that one in six volunteers reported withholding their services due to fear of exposure to liability suits.
The study also found:
1 out of 7 nonprofit agencies had eliminated one or more of their valuable programs because of their exposure to lawsuits;
16% of volunteer board members surveyed reported withholding their services to an organization out of the fear of liability; and
The average reported increase in insurance premiums for nonprofits over the previous three years (1985-1988) was 155%, and one in eight organizations reported an increase of over 100%.
This study demonstrated clearly that the threat of lawsuits has had a negative effect on volunteer participation in charitable organizations thus jeopardizing the ability of charities to serve.
Although most states have adopted legislation since that time to protect volunteers, the statutes vary in their definitions and in the scope of immunity granted the situation has not improved. According to the Nonprofits’ Risk Management and Insurance Institute, every state has a provision applying to directors and officers of organizations. However, many states have not provided immunity for direct service volunteers. About half of the states have provisions for general volunteers, while approximately 20 states focus specifically for volunteers in sports-related activities.
Volunteers play an integral part in community service and should not fear litigation when they serve their communities. In order to encourage the volunteerism needed to meet the needs of our children, our senior citizens, the disabled and the nation as a whole, comprehensive legislation must be enacted to protect volunteers from frivolous litigation.
Organizations and Volunteers Covered
The Liability Reform for Volunteer Services Act protects “volunteer service organizations” which are defined as “nonprofit organizations that are organized for the public benefit and operated primarily for charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or health.” Health care providers are specifically excluded from coverage.
Individuals who provide volunteer services to such nonprofit organizations or governmental entities also are covered if they are acting in good faith, within the scope of their official duties, and do not receive any compensation or material benefits for their services.
The bill establishes a uniform standard for awarding of punitive damages (damages which are designed to punish the defendant or deter others from engaging in the same activity) against volunteer services organizations or a volunteer. Those suing charities and volunteers would be required to establish by “clear and convincing evidence” that the organization or its volunteers acted with a “conscious, flagrant indifference to the rights or safety of others” and that such conduct caused the harm for which the suit is brought. This “clear and convincing standard” is slightly higher than the “preponderance of the evidence” standard used in most civil cases, but is less than the criminal standard which requires evidence to be “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Punitive damages also would be capped at two times economic (loss of earnings, medical expenses, loss of business opportunities, etc.) and noneconomic (pain and suffering, emotional distress, etc.) losses, or $250,000, whichever is less. The bill prohibits courts from disclosing the existence of the cap to juries.
So as to not influence the jury, either party to a lawsuit also may require that the court proceedings to determine whether punitive damages should be awarded be dealt with separately from the issue of liability.
Proportion of Fault
Volunteer service organizations and volunteers would be liable for damages only in direct proportion to the degree to which they are responsible for the damages. This would prevent charities from becoming targets of lawsuits simply because they are the deepest pockets available.
The protections for organizations and volunteers in this bill would not apply anytime the actions involved constitute a crime of violence, terrorism, a hate crime, a civil rights violation, or a sexual offense for which a conviction has been obtained against the volunteer or organizations. The protections also do not apply whenever a volunteer has been found to have been under the influence of alcohol or drugs.