09 Jan 2004 What Conservatives Think #010904: Single-Payer Health Care: Could America Do It Without Compromising Quality?
The Left Says:
“…In countries with national health insurance, urgent care is always provided immediately. Other countries do experience some waits for elective procedures (like cataract removal), but maintaining the U.S.’s same level of health expenditures (twice as much as the next-highest country), waits would be much shorter or even non-existent.”
Source: “Single-Payer Myths; Single-Payer Facts,” Physicians for a National Health Program, downloaded from http://www.pnhp.org/facts/singlepayer_myths_singlepayer_facts.php on December 5, 2003
What Conservatives Think:
Nationalized health systems set fixed annual budgets for medical services. This has the effect of rationing medical care and creating waiting lists for treatment.
In a private system, medical services providers make more money by providing more services.
In a single-payer system, the incentives are reversed. The more patients a provider treats, and the sicker the patients are, the quicker the provider will deplete its budget. When that happens, it will be forced to suspend services until new money is available. In other words, rationing.
Source: Talking Points #17 – Why National Health Insurance Means Waiting for Care, National Center for Public Policy Research, available online at http://www.nationalcenter.org/TPHealth17.html