Corrupt Black Leadership and Culture of Failure Impede Black Progress, by La Shawn Barber

Corrupt Black Leadership and Culture of Failure Impede Black Progress

by La Shawn Barber

On May 17, 2004, during the NAACP’s 50th anniversary celebration of Brown v. Board of Education – the 1954 Supreme Court case that ended government-mandated racial segregation in public schools – featured speaker Bill Cosby surprised the audience of limousine liberals.

Instead of a canned speech about the benefits of Brown and how far blacks had come since segregation, he led with a righteously indignant censure about wasted opportunities in the post-civil rights movement era, including criminality, illegitimacy, drug abuse and other pathologies that have eroded poor black communities.

This is what’s known in the vernacular as airing dirty laundry.

National Public Radio senior correspondent and FOX News political analyst Juan Williams has committed the same sin in his new book, Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America – and What We Can Do About It. Williams exhorts so-called black leaders to return to the days when leadership had meaning and purpose beyond corporate shakedowns, scandals and outdated rants about the sins of white people.

Influenced by Cosby’s resounding and still-reverberating speech, Williams argues that poor blacks are not holding up their end of the Brown deal. With the enormous changes effected through civil rights legislation, blacks today have opportunities those who came before them couldn’t even imagine. Poor blacks aren’t poor because of white racism; they are caught up in a culture of failure, and the current crop of black leaders helps perpetuate the cycle.

Black leaders must stop painting blacks as powerless victims, says Williams, and use their energy and resources to help poor blacks equip themselves to compete in a global economy, which has little regard for historical (and outdated) racial grievances. Today’s leaders “misinform, mismanage and miseducate by refusing to articulate established truths about what it takes to get ahead: strong families, education and hard work.”

In a fluid prose style, Williams provides a panoramic view of post-slavery black leadership, which emphasized high moral character, hard work and self-sacrifice, revealing a sharp dividing line between leaders like Frederick Douglass, Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois, and corrupt post-civil rights “leaders” Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, and big-city mayors like Marion Barry.

Blacks did not make enormous gains during their struggle for full citizenship and equal justice by playing put-upon victims. They made those gains by harnessing the power to control their own destinies. Williams writes:

A streak of self-determination rises at every turn in the history of black American leadership. But since the stunning success of the modern civil rights movement… the strong focus on self-determination has faded, at the moment when its impact could have been the most powerful. In its place is a tired rant by civil rights leaders about the power of white people.

Long before the left-leaning journalist wrote Enough, a book with a decidedly conservative slant, Williams was considered a turncoat, his support for policies like affirmative action notwithstanding. One would assume that a man who penned Eyes on the Prize: America’s Civil Rights Years, 1954-1965, the companion volume to the award-winning PBS series of the same name, would be immune from such charges. But his conservative-like views on taboo issues leave him wide open for insults.

Swaying – let alone straying – from the party line seems to be the only taboo left in black America. High crime and out-of-wedlock birth rates were accepted as normal long ago. Williams breaks through the taboo and offers common sense advice and solutions.

I’ll dub one solution the “avoid-poverty” formula, echoing Williams’s sentiments: Graduate from high school, get and keep a job before marrying, get married, and don’t have babies until after you’re 21 and married. Williams notes the poverty rate for the black man or woman who follows this formula is 6.4 percent, compared to the current black poverty rate of 21.5 percent.

But the avoid-poverty formula sounds too simple for some. It’s also devoid of whites-as-oppressors language. Simple solutions that have served black Americans well, including the courage to face hardships, the dignity to withstand insult and persist despite obstacles, and a commitment to sacrifice for the next generation, are of little interest to black leaders focused on white guilt, “oppression” and dollar signs.

Williams quotes Booker T. Washington, a former slave who knew all about oppression and had actual grievances against white America: “We should not permit our grievances to overshadow our opportunities.”

That is the vital yet simple message of Enough.

# # #

LaShawn Barber is an editor for the black leadership network Project 21. This article first appeared in The Washington Examiner. La Shawn Barber may be reached at

Published by The National Center for Public Policy Research. Reprints permitted provided source is credited. New Visions Commentaries reflect the views of their author, and not necessarily those of Project 21 or the National Center for Public Policy Research.

The National Center for Public Policy Research is a communications and research foundation supportive of a strong national defense and dedicated to providing free market solutions to today’s public policy problems. We believe that the principles of a free market, individual liberty and personal responsibility provide the greatest hope for meeting the challenges facing America in the 21st century.