AMC Confronted about Its Threats to Georgia Over Pro-Life Legislation

“Walking Dead” Maker Oozes Compassion over Penguins Losing Their Young While Doubling down on Pro-Death Stance for Human Babies

New York, NY/Washington, D.C. – When pressed, AMC Networks executives did not back off from their threats to stop all filming in Georgia if the Peach State’s recent pro-life legislation becomes law.

Instead, AMC Networks CEO Josh Sapan stood by the company’s line – that it is closely monitoring all developments surrounding the Georgia law – in response to a question from Free Enterprise Project (FEP) Director Justin Danhof, Esq., at today’s annual meeting of AMC shareholders held in New York City. In May, AMC blasted the legislation and suggested that it would reevaluate its business in Georgia if the law went into effect. Then last week, AMC Networks President Sarah Barnett made the wild claim that this is a civil rights issue.

Justin Danhof

Justin Danhof, Esq.

“AMC is now deeply entrenched in America’s culture wars – and it has staked an extreme anti-life position,” said Danhof. “The irony is that the company moved much of its production to Georgia because of the state’s conservative pro-business laws. However, now that the state is trying to implement conservative legislation on social issues, AMC is trying to force its far-left worldview onto Georgia. The causticness is rich.”

At the meeting, Danhof noted:

Let me suggest that the company should make filming decisions based on economics, not by taking sides in culture battles. And indeed, Georgia is a great environment for the film industry. Sound business, not the rants of Alyssa Milano and Amy Schumer, should dictate corporate decision making.

First, I want to ask about the company’s position on some other abortion laws.

In New York, viable babies can be killed under the nation’s most extreme pro-death law that allows abortion up until the day of delivery. And in Virginia, the Commonwealth has considered legislation that, as the governor has noted, would allow babies to be murdered even after they are born. Will AMC consider pulling any current or future work from either of those states?

In response, Sapan thanked Danhof for his question, but never once addressed the crux of the issue.

“The fact that Sapan stayed silent on pro-death policies such as the law in New York and legislation in Virginia says it all. AMC is not concerned about extreme measures to terminate babies, only laws that would protect those children. That’s shameful,” said Danhof.

At the shareholder meeting, AMC shared a number of clips from upcoming shows. One of those clips, from a BBC nature program, focused on the film crew’s reaction to a group of penguins that were stuck in a shallow hollow, unable to get out. As the adult penguins fought tirelessly to protect their chicks, with some of them perishing, the crew got emotional and took the unusual step of intervening and creating a pass so the penguins could climb out. After watching this clip, Danhof asked Sapan:

We all just watched a clip of BBC filmmakers becoming emotional after witnessing penguins in the wild fighting to save their young, and some dying, under harsh conditions. Why can’t this company have just as much passion for human life as it does for penguins?

“Everyone in the room was pulling for the penguins. It’s too bad the executive team at AMC can’t pull for human life in the same way,” said Danhof. “If that’s not a fitting commentary on how perverse liberal culture has become on life issues, I don’t know what is.”

Danhof’s full question at today’s meeting is available here.

Last week, Danhof confronted Netflix CEO Reed Hastings over similar threats to withdraw from Georgia. In an act of corporate cowardice, Hastings refused to even acknowledge the question.

Today’s AMC meeting marks the 27th time FEP has participated in a shareholder meeting in 2019.

Support our work! Click this image to help FEP challenge corporations that are fighting pro-life legislation.

Launched in 2007, the National Center’s Free Enterprise Project focuses on shareholder activism and the confluence of big government and big business. Over the past four years alone, FEP representatives have participated in over 100 shareholder meetings – advancing free-market ideals about health care, energy, taxes, subsidies, regulations, religious freedom, food policies, media bias, gun rights, workers’ rights and other important public policy issues. As the leading voice for conservative-minded investors, it annually files more than 90 percent of all right-of-center shareholder resolutions. Dozens of liberal organizations, however, annually file more than 95 percent of all policy-oriented shareholder resolutions and continue to exert undue influence over corporate America.

FEP activity has been covered by media outlets including the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Variety, the Associated Press, Bloomberg, Drudge Report, Business Insider, National Public Radio and SiriusXM. FEP’s work was prominently featured in Wall Street Journal writer Kimberley Strassel’s 2016 book The Intimidation Game: How the Left is Silencing Free Speech (Hachette Book Group).

The National Center for Public Policy Research, founded in 1982, is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations. It receives over 350,000 individual contributions a year from over 60,000 active recent contributors. Sign up for email updates here. Follow us on Twitter at @FreeEntProject and @NationalCenter for general announcements. To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by National Center staff, follow our media appearances Twitter account at @NCPPRMedia.


The National Center for Public Policy Research is a communications and research foundation supportive of a strong national defense and dedicated to providing free market solutions to today’s public policy problems. We believe that the principles of a free market, individual liberty and personal responsibility provide the greatest hope for meeting the challenges facing America in the 21st century.