Is it Better to Have a Raise or a Job? How a Minimum Wage Hike Would Increase Unemployment, Harm Undertrained Workers, by Amy Ridenour

Is it better to have a raise or a job?

It’s a no-brainer. A raise is worthless without a job.

The federal government reported October 5 that 199,000 jobs were lost between mid-August and mid-September, reflecting a national unemployment rate of 4.9%.1 Private sector economists are predicting that, thanks in part to the September 11 terrorist attacks, the unemployment rate will climb to six percent by early 2002.2

Against this backdrop, some in Congress want to increase the minimum wage. Somehow it makes sense to them to raise the cost of labor during a shrinking job market. Led by Senator Ted Kennedy, chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Democrats have proposed raising the $5.15 minimum wage by $1.50, a 29% increase. Earlier this year some Republicans signaled they would acquiesce to a $1 increase.3 The White House has signaled that it does not support a minimum wage increase at this time.

The minimum wage was last increased by legislation passed in 1996, which raised it from $4.25 to $4.75 on October 1, 1996, and again to $5.15 per hour, on September 1, 1997.4

Since the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938, labor advocates have contended that a constantly increasing minimum wage will prevent the exploitation of unskilled and part-time workers.5 And some politicians continually trot out the issue, confident that even if its economic effects aren’t as advertised, the political benefits of appearing to care about the working poor are.

But yet another of our many dozens of upward wage adjustments will fail to succeed in creating economic stability for those at the bottom end of the pay scale, and, particularly unfortunate at this time of economic uncertainty, are likely to exacerbate unemployment.

As Sharon Brooks Hodge of the African-American leadership group Project 21 has written: “Wages are a reflection of relative work skills. You can trust that no one is out there lobbying for a minimum skills floor to coincide with the demand for more money. Until that happens, this segment of the work force will remain unable to compete for higher wages on their own. What [those] clamoring for a higher minimum wage fail to acknowledge is that boosting pay for that reason alone does little more than continue the endless spiral of inflation.”6

And put more money in the coffers of labor unions, as well. Unions benefit from minimum wage increases because many union contracts use the federal minimum wage as a base. Unions receive a percentage of their members’ pay in dues.

Other leading African-Americans endorse Hodge’s view: “Forty years ago, when Jim Crow was alive and well but before substantial increases in the minimum wage, the unemployment rate for black youths was virtually identical to that of white youths. But with the rise in the minimum wage, there has been a rise in the unemployment rates of black youth,” says Peter Kirsanow, Chairman of the Center for New Black Leadership and a labor attorney.7

Black youths, through no fault of their own, disproportionately attend failing inner-city schools. The government thus hits them with a double-whammy: It gives them substandard training in public schools, and then it raises the minimum wage, which reduces the number of jobs for untrained people.

Minimum wage increases, while not designed to be racist, simply are.

According to a study by David Neumark for the Employment Policies Institute, an increase in the minimum wage would have the perverse effect of increasing both the school dropout rate and teenage unemployment. This is so because higher mandatory minimum wages will entice some students into sacrificing school for work while at the same time compel many employers to forgo hiring low-skill teenagers in favor of older employees whose experience makes them worth hiring at higher wage rates.8

These facts are no secret: A University of New Hampshire poll of the nation’s economists has shown that nearly 80% acknowledge that minimum wage hikes cause job losses.9

The Dallas-based National Center for Policy Analysis notes that, in 1981, the federally-mandated Minimum Wage Study Commission concluded that each ten percent rise in the minimum wage reduces teenage employment by one to three percent. The NCPA also points out that a study of the 27% increase in 1990-91 by economists Donald Deere, Kevin Murphy and Finis Welch, published in the American Economic Review in May 1995, found that the increase reduced employment for all teenagers by 7.3% and for black teenagers by ten percent. A study of the two-stage 21% increase over 1996-97 by economists Richard Burkhauser, Kenneth Couch and David Wittenburg found a decline in employment of two percent to six percent for each ten percent increase in the minimum wage.10

Nevertheless, the crusade for a minimum wage increase continues, always in the guise of “help” to workers. Advocates of increases always gloss over the job loss issue. Rarely do they answer the question: If it is good to raise wages a dollar an hour, why not raise them $50 an hour? Wouldn’t that be fifty times better?

The answer, of course, is that it is much harder to pretend that raising wages by $50 per hour will not kill jobs. The pretense that raising wages by legislative fiat is a benevolent act must be maintained.

If we are going to again raise the minimum wage because politicians can’t stand to forgo a nice headline and labor unions love cash above all else, we could at least do so honestly, and admit that doing so kills jobs. And that the people who will lose those jobs will be our most vulnerable.

Amy Ridenour is President of The National Center for Public Policy Research, a Washington, D.C. think tank. 


1 Steven Pearlstein, “Economists See Recession Now, and Worse Ahead; Workforce Down 199,000 Before Attacks; Unemployment Rate Expected to Surge,” Washington Post, October 6, 2001, p. E1, available on the Internet at
2 Pearlstein.
3 Helen Dewar and Mike Allen, “As Deal on Spending Nears, Bush Turns to Stimulus; Compromise Likely On ‘Worker Relief,'” Washington Post, September 29, 2001, p. A02, available on the Internet at
4 Bruce Bartlett, Brief Analysis No. 292, “The Minimum Wage: Teen-age Job Killer,” National Center for Policy Analysis, Dallas, TX, May 20, 1999, downloaded from the Internet at on October 6, 2001.
5 Sharon Brooks Hodge, “Workers of America Unite! – For A Minimum Wage Increase?,” New Visions Commentary, The National Center for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC, April 1996, available on the Internet at
6 Hodge.
7 Peter Kirsanow, “President Clinton’s Plan to Increase Unemployment: Raise the Minimum Wage, New Visions Commentary, The National Center for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC, March 1996, available on the Internet at
8 “Minimum Wage Increase Would Increase Teen Drop-Out and Unemployment Rates, Says African-American Group,” press release of The National Center for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC, December 1, 1995, available on the Internet at
99 Kirsanow.
10 Bartlett.

Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives for over 25 years, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research. Its members have been quoted, interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992. Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated, and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project 21.