22 Jun 2020 Defunding Police Defeats Public Safety, Especially in Black Communities, by Nadra Enzi
George Floyd’s murder was a horrific crime, and it has literally changed the world. But we need to take a moment to calm ourselves. We must reflect on our goals for fixing law enforcement problems before letting radical activists take control of the criminal justice reform agenda.
That’s because — in the wake of the memorial services, protests and riots — there has been a steady call for changing the police by defunding them.
On the June 14 edition of “Face the Nation,” an interview with Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best was prophetically titled “Policing will never be as it was.” Truer words have yet to be written.
Chief Best appears to be at odds with Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan over how to deal with protesters who created the “Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone.” Now called CHOP, or “Capitol Hill Organized Protest,” this occupation of several square blocks shows how the sides are lining up in this raging debate.
While she says there is not a “cop-free zone” in the city, Best’s decision not to forcibly disband the CHAZ/CHOP reflects a hesitancy among departments in dealing with protesters who insist they are free of a police presence.
Whichever side has the upper hand, the bottom line is that governments are anxious to avoid the next high-profile police use of deadly force and rioting thereafter.
Defunding may actually be more of a wish than reality given complex webs of municipal, state and federal law in addition to civil service and police union regulations. But people like me — “safety citizens” who value our communities and want to work with authorities to keep them crime-free — must take these radical activists at their word. The screaming protesters and slightly less shrill elected officials are demanding defunding. Safety citizens need to make it clear we support fully funded and empowered police departments. Period. And they need to know that we also support punishing rogue officers.
Both safety citizens and police critics hoped earlier community policing policies would be the solution to long-term tensions between law enforcement and urban communities. Its focus on relationship-building at all levels, however, seems to have fallen short of the mark. In fact, it appears that relationship-building between police and the public gave way to calls for diminished police powers and even abolishing the profession altogether.
Defunding proposals couldn’t come at worse time. Culturally, American law enforcement became increasingly unpopular since the 2014 death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo. This tipping point birthed “de-policing,” where officers who feel they are under too much scrutiny cease being proactive for fear of termination or even prosecution by state and federal authorities.
A bitter irony emerges with the rise of Black Lives Matter activism. Less empowered and underfunded police departments will effectively be set up to fail in underserved low-income, high-crime communities. My grassroots security consulting began in such an area. I know firsthand that less monied and less empowered departments mean more misery for majority-Black communities.
These poorly funded departments already experience personnel shortages and lengthy 911 response times. Residents in the occupied CHAZ/CHOP are complaining about a lack of first responders. How will matters be made worse by withholding or terminating police budgets there and across America?
Regardless of whether defunding demands are wishful thinking or determined steps toward an abolition of the police profession, one inescapable conclusion remains: Defunding police is defeating public safety. This defeat will be acutely felt in the very communities that are screaming that Black lives matter.
New Visions Commentaries reflect the views of their author, and not necessarily those of Project 21, other Project 21 members, or the National Center for Public Policy Research, its board or staff.