{"id":21055,"date":"2006-12-22T00:24:36","date_gmt":"2006-12-22T04:24:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nationalcenter.org\/?p=21055"},"modified":"2017-10-04T16:22:30","modified_gmt":"2017-10-04T20:22:30","slug":"ex-cons-to-get-special-rights-in-dc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nationalcenter.org\/ncppr\/2006\/12\/22\/ex-cons-to-get-special-rights-in-dc\/","title":{"rendered":"Ex-Cons to Get Special Rights in DC?"},"content":{"rendered":"
The proposal<\/a> adopted by the District of Columbia City Council to give rehabilitated ex-cons a special protected status under the law in DC strangely seems to be staying under the radar of most of our nation’s talk hosts, bloggers and reporters.<\/p>\n Fortunately, some are beginning to take notice.<\/p>\n Tom Blumer at BizzyBlog<\/a> has dug out the legislation from the less-then-people-friendly D.C. Council website, and provides information that was not in my post.<\/p>\n Kim Priestap, writing on Wizbang, points out<\/a>: “…if Marion Barry’s bill passes, Sandy Burglar would become a member of a protected class, making it illegal to deny him a job in D.C. because he stole classified documents from the National Archives.”<\/p>\n And Courtney Mabeus, writing in the news section of the Examiner, notes<\/a> concerns by a public official that “someone who robbed a bank, you don\u2019t want working in a bank.\u201d<\/p>\n Precisely.<\/p>\n